Прислано Sedat Canbaz 24-07-2015 14:10
#430
Hello again )
Here is one strategy test competition more, which I run approx. 2 weeks ago:
Conditions:
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3210M CPU @ 2.50GHz
Hash: 128, Threads: 1, time/pos: 12 Seconds
Test duration (per engine): 24 Minutes
Strategic Test Suite Results: Higher is Better
The Ranking is generated by STS Rating v3
Код
Engine Score
Houdini 4 x64 64/120
Komodo 9.01 x64 63/120
Stockfish 090715 x64 59/120
SugaR v5.4 x64 57/120
*Note that I tested the chess engines with 120 positions (based on STS1-STS15_LAN.epd)
Another note is that, I preferred the unsolved positions in 1 sec/move by the above engine versions
In shortly: No any of the used positions were solved in 1 sec/move by the current tested engines
And this should be known too,
My used 300 positions in 5 sec per move:
http://www.sedatc...ge_id=1742
I preferred the unsolved positions in 3 sec/move by Rybka 4.1 x64
Probably this is the reason about why Houdini 4 could not win at 5 sec/move, where Sugar's performance was great...
Because almost all of us know that Houdini is based mainly on IPPO (Rybka)
For example,(on my private testings) Rybka 4.1 x64 at 5 sec/move managed to get just 40 points
It seems, extra adding 2 seconds (from 3 to 5), Rybka scored better than zero )
But here, (even with Rybka's weakness) H4 managed to win at 3 min per move:
http://www.sedatc...ge_id=1849
Of course here with all 1500 positions, Houdini is again Number ONE:
http://www.sedatc...ge_id=1761
Yes...I'd just decided to share my thoughts....
Best,
Sedat