Прислано Sedat Canbaz 29-10-2015 15:40
#502
Update: 29.10.2015
Код
Engine : Points
Stockfish 251015 x64 : 304
NirvanaChess 2.2 x64 : 207
Protector 1.9.0 x64 : 157
Pedone 1.3 x64 : 125
ProDeo 2.0 w32 : 112
Maverick 1.5 x64 : 104
CyberPagno 2.3 w32 : 84
NanoSzachy 4.1 x64 : 78
Details,
- Stockfish 251015 (Author: lucasart) performed 13 points less than StockfishTS 240915
- NirvanaChess 2.2 x64 performed 18 points better than NirvanaChess 2.1c x64
- Protector 1.9.0 is bugy as previous its versions (performed much worse: 157 points)
* Protector 1.8.0 is tested via Polyglot adapter, where v1.9.0 as native (UCI)
- The latest Donna 3.1 x64 version does not support analyze mode too
- Pedone 1.3 x64 performed 3 points less than Pedone 1.2 x64
- ProDeo 2.0 w32 performed 5 points less than ProDeo 1.87 w32
- Maverick 1.5 x64 performed 5 points better than Maverick 1.0 x64
- NanoSzachy 4.1 x64 performed 1 points less than NanoSzachy 4 x64
- CyberPagno 2.3 w32 performed 8 points better than CyberPagno 2.2 w32
*CyberPagno, Maverick, NirvanaChess are the only ones in this update,
which managed to scored better than older versions...congrats to their developers !
More Details,
Probably I will publish my used EPD database after when X chess engine will pass Houdini !)
So till to this date, TTs test positions are planning to be kept as private (as before)
And I really wonder: who will be this hero ?) who will be able to add best tactical improvement!
SCCT - TTs (3 seconds per position) - All Versions:
https://sites.goo...s/tts-3sec
SCCT - TTs Conditions/Rules:
[url]https://sites.google.com/site/computerschess/tts-3sec-conditions
[/url]
Best Regards,
Sedat